Dan Accidentally Hoists Himself on His Own Petard
In the comments to one of Dan’s standard miserable rants, appears this gem –
In answer to Whateverman asking ‘Is absolute certainty possible without omniscience?’ Dan says ‘I would say no…’
Brilliant, there’s maybe hope for the man yet! I’ll address the following directly to Dan – Dan, now that you’ve realised that absolute certainty is impossible without omniscience, how do you explain that favourite phrase of yourself and $ye ‘We have had the truth revealed to us in such a way as we can be certain of it’? By YOUR OWN REASONING you CANNOT be certain of anything unless you are omniscient – so, which is it? Are you lying when you say that you have ‘had things revealed to [you] in such a way that you can be certain of them’ knowing that you would need to be omniscient to be certain, or are you omniscient yourself?
Which is it? Are you a liar, or do you think yourself to be a god?