an atheist viewpoint

thoughts from a non-theist

Joe Cienkowski is a total Fucking Idiot

What has Joe done now to draw my wrath? Well, he’s posted the following on Twitter….

Yeah, that’s right Joe, the rock solid, observed, quantified, and thoroughly proven Theory of Evolution ‘dumbs people down’. How’s that transference working out for you? Seriously, what a crock of outright stupidity.

‘Makes them believe the impossible can happen’?? Joe, you believe that a talking snake made a woman eat a magic fruit, you believe that all the millions of species on Earth fitted on a small boat for a year, you believe that your god sent plagues on Egypt, you believe that the walls of Jericho fell, you believe that a man was born to a woman who’d never had sex, and that the same man turned water into wine, walked on the surface of the sea, brought people back to life, cast evil spirits into pigs, and came back back to life! You believe that your god made the whole world in a week, only six thousand years ago! ‘Believe the impossible’? You’re the one believing the impossible. Do you realise that there is ZERO evidence that any of the above happened, and plenty to support the view that it didn’t?

But what’s this?

Oh, you’re going to leave evolution ‘rendered useless & nonsense’ by your ‘books’ and website? Joe, slavishly copying, with no understanding of what you’re saying, the ‘work’ of Ken Ham and Kent Hovind isn’t going to render ANYTHING ‘useless & nonsense’. Both those men, and the rest of their Creationist idiot crowd are frauds and morons, and Joe is  the biggest moron of the lot.

Single Post Navigation

6 thoughts on “Joe Cienkowski is a total Fucking Idiot

  1. An observation:     When creationists state that evolution is an unproven theory, most supporters of evolution point out that science isn't in the business of proving anything. Scientists propose explanations and see if they are consistent with later experiments. It is my personal belief that the "theory of evolution" makes no more predictions than creationism does and so is just as meaningless. I only see people saying (after an experiment) that it "predicted" whatever the result was. If the result had been different, so would the "prediction."

  2. This post has been removed by the author.

  3. @PvblivsWhat are the predictions of Creationism again?

  4. Well let's be honest, Peachy's opinion of his abilities far outweighs the reality of it."The Grand Reality" was meant to kill Atheism ("will be a tsunami that will leave Atheist's on the shores") so his book about proving creationism is a real science will be another one of those piss yourselves laughing episodes.

  5. I only see people saying (after an experiment) that it "predicted" whatever the result was.Predictions can be about things in the past that we haven't discovered yet. It can be like forensics or archeology. Darwin used it to predict that our human ancestors arose in Africa. Then fossils provided evidence then genetic evidence sealed the deal.I find it incredibly exciting! 🙂

  6. Pentagram:     Creationism also makes no predictions.

Write what you like, but don't cry if you act like a dick and get banned for it

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: